German Reich (1942)
SPG – 10 Built + 2 Prototypes
Design and Production
The large German engineering company Krupp had been involved in designing and manufacturing ammunition, artillery, armored fighting vehicles and weapons for the German Army for many years. They had received their first order to build 135 Panzer I tanks in 1933.
In 1939, they turned their attention to the problem of how to mount a large artillery gun on a tank chassis. Their solution was to fix a 10.5cm LeFH 18/1 artillery light field howitzer on top of a shortened Panzer IV tank chassis in an open-topped turret. It was given the official designation 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschutzwagen IVb. The chassis had only had six road wheels rather than the normal eight. The six wheels were 570mm diameter instead of the normal 470mm diameter road wheels. It also only had three not four top track rollers. Krupp presented their design to the military on 14th September 1939.
Completed 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschützwagen IVb at the factory. It was based on a shortened Panzer IV tank chassis with only six wheels and not the regular 8.
The turret could not fully traverse 360 degrees. It could only traverse 70 degrees: 35 degrees to the left and 35 degrees to the right. It was not a tank, even though it may resemble one at first glance.
Two test vehicles were built. They were given the internal factory designations of V1 and V2 (nothing to do with the later flying bomb and rocket). The letter ‘V’ was an abbreviation for the German word ‘Versuchs’ which translated means trail or prototype. The German Army liked what they saw and put an order in for 10 more to be built in the autumn of 1941.
The first one was completed at the Krupp-Grusonwerk factory in August 1941, three more in September, four in October, one in November and one in December 1941. The 10 vehicles were accepted into the army in January 1942.
The first two test vehicles V1 and V2 were powered by a Maybach HL66P engine that produced 188 hp. The next ten SPGs were given a more powerful engine, a Maybach HL90 P20k 12-cylinder engine that produced 320 hp. Their chassis numbers ranged from 150631 to 150640. They were given the official designation of 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschützwagen IVb (Sd.Kfz.165/1). This was shortened to 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf GW IVb or Pz.Sfl.IVb.
Pz.Sfl.IVb artillery self-propelled gun at the crew training center
The turret armor was not thick. It ranged from 14.5 to 30 mm (0.57-1.18 in). It provided the gun crew protection from small arms fire, high explosive shell fragments and mortars. The open top reduced weight and allowed the commander all round vision. In bad weather, a tarpaulin was fixed over the top of the open turret. It was also used in very hot weather. When not in use, it was rolled up on top of the rear turret storage box.
The Panzer IV hull mounted machine gun was removed to free up more storage space. This vehicle was not designed to be an assault gun or anti-tank gun. It was to provide mobile artillery support that could keep up with the attacking Panzer Divisions.
It was not envisaged to be fighting on the front line. It could fire high explosive shells over long distances onto enemy targets it was given via a grid reference by forward observation units. If Soviet infantry got too close they could use their personal weapons or retreat as fast as they could to a safer location.
The gun was issued with a few armor piercing AP rounds for self-defense if they were surprised by Soviet tanks. They only worked at close range and were ineffective against the front armor of the more heavily armored T-34 and KV-1 tanks.
The commander sat at the rear of the turret on the left side behind the gunner. He had access to a range finding periscope mounted to the side of the vehicle. The gunner’s gun sight poked out above the top of the forward gun shield and armor casement. The loader sat on the right side of the vehicle.
Spare road wheels were often fixed to the rear engine deck. The vehicle was fitted with six enlarged 520 diameter road wheels on both sides to cope with the extra weight, not the normal Panzer IV tank’s eight pairs of 470 mm diameter road wheels per side. In the case of damage to the wheels, they could be changed by the crew. A square jacking block was affixed to the right side of the hull just under the rear of the turret. The jack was kept on the rear track guard at the back near to it. Metal tow cables were stored around the outer turret armour plates.
Spare track links were fixed to the rear storage box at the back of the turret. A mock driver’s armoured vison slit replaced the hull machine gun on the right side of the front upper hull in an effort to confuse enemy gunners. The driver sat on the left of the SPG.
During 1942, the ten prototypes underwent trials on the German Army’s eastern test range with the Feld-Versuchs Batterie (field test battery), 16th Panzer Artillery Regiment, 12th Panzer Division. These were successful. An order for a further 200 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf GW IVb SPGs was placed. They were going to be built at the Stahlindustrie in Muelheim-Rhur. The problem was building enough Panzer IV tank chassis to be converted into artillery self-propelled guns. More Panzer IV tanks were urgently required to deal with the Soviet Army’s new T-34 and KV-1 tanks.
In the meantime, the engineers realized that they could mount the same 10.5cm artillery gun on the now obsolete Panzer II tank chassis. This new SPG was later known as the Wespe. No more 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf GW IVb self-propelled artillery guns were built. The order for the additional 200 was canceled in November 1942.
The 10.5cm LeFH 18/1 howitzer
The 10.5 cm leFH 18 gun was a German light howitzer used in World War II. The abbreviation leFH stands for the German words ‘leichte FeldHaubitze’ which, translated, means light field howitzer. It was fitted with a ‘Mundungbremse’ muzzle brake to allow longer range charges to be fired and reduce the amount of recoil on the gun. This increased the operational life of the gun barrel.
The 105 mm (4.13 in) high explosive HE shell weighed 14.81 kg (32.7 lb). The armor piercing shell weighed 14.25 kg (31.4lb). It had a muzzle velocity of 470 m/s (1,542 ft/s) and a maximum firing range of 10,675 m (11,675 yds). With a good gun crew, it had a rate of fire between 4-6 rounds per minute.
The 10.5cm leichte Feld Haubitze 18 gun was not very useful in the direct-fire mode against enemy armored vehicles. It could only penetrate 52 mm (2 in) of armor plate at a very short range of 500 meters.
The high explosive shell was in two pieces. It was a ‘separate loading’ or two part round. First, the high explosive HE projectile would be loaded and then the cartridge propellant case. Depending on the range of the target different sized bags of propellant were inserted into the cartridge. More bags were used for longer range targets.
All ten vehicles served with the Panzer-Artillerie-Regiment 16, attached to the 16.Panzer-Division on the Eastern Front. The Division was held in reserve during the Balkan Campaign, but took part in the invasion of the Soviet Union, Operation Barbarossa, in June 1941.
It was used in the southern sector of the Front, advancing to Stalingrad via Lvov, Pervomaisk, Zaporozhe, Taganrog, Makeevka and Artemorsk. The 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschutzwagen IVb joined the rest of 16.Panzer-Division in late December early January. The regiment was destroyed in early 1943 in the Stalingrad pocket.
Artillerie Selbstfahrlafetten – Panzer Tracts No.10 by Thomas L.Jentz
Panzer Tracts 10–1 Artillerie Sfl. – by Thomas L. Jentz, Hilary Louis Doyle, 2012
Beute-Kraftfahrzeuge und panzer der deutschen Wehrmacht by Walter J. Spielberger
On Achtung Panzer
Illustration by David Bocquelet
10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschützwagen IVb self-propelled artillery gun in gray livery. The gun crew have their thick long winter overcoasts on. Notice the false armored driver’s vision slit where the hull machine gun would have been.
The 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf GW IVb turret had a gunner’s periscope sight at the front on the right side. Behind that was a range finder fixed to the side for use by the commander. Tools were fastened onto the upper track guards and spare track links were fixed to the rear of the turret.
Newly completed 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf GW IVb SPG at the factory. Notice that the tow cable is stowed around the turret and spare road wheels are on top of the engine compartment at the rear.
View of the rear of a 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschützwagen IVb showing the tow bar, exhaust system and spare road wheels and track links.
The gunner sat on the left of the gun with the commander behind him in the 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschützwagen IVb
Tools like the jack, jack plate, axe and spade were strapped down to the right hand side rear track guard.
10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschutzwagen IVb awaiting deployment in a forest
A US ordnance team inspecting the Rheinmetall proving ground at Hillersleben found this gun less 10.5cm leFH 18/1 (Sf) auf Geschutzwagen IVb artillery SPG.
|Dimensions (LxWxH)||5.9 m x 2.87 m x 2.25 m
19ft 4in x 9ft 5in x 7ft 5in
|Total weight, battle ready||18 tonnes (19.84 tons)|
|Crew||4 (commander, driver, gunner, loader)|
|Prototype Engine||Maybach HL 66 P 6-cylinder inline water cooled 6.6 litre gasoline/petrol engine, 188 hp|
|Production Engine||Maybach HL 90 P20k 12-cylinder water cooled gasoline/petrol engine, 320 hp|
|Top road speed||35 km/h (22 mph)|
|Operational range on road||240 km (149 miles)|
|Operational range off-road||130 km (81 miles)|
|Main armament||10.5 cm leFH 18/1 L/28 howitzer, 60 rounds|
|Front hull armor||12–30 mm (0.47-1.18 in)|
|Side and rear hull armor||14.5 mm (0.57 in)|
|Front turret armor||20–30 mm (0.79-1.18 in)|
|Side and rear turret armor||14.5 mm (0.57 in)|
|Total production||10+2 prototypes|
German Self-Propelled Artillery Guns of the Second World War
By Craig Moore
One towed artillery gun required a team of six horses and nine men. WW2 German engineers came up with the idea of mounting an artillery gun on top of a tank chassis. This new technology reduced the amount of resources required to deploy one artillery gun. Artillery self-propelled guns only needed a four or five man crew. They could also be made ready to fire more quickly. This book covers the development and use of this new weapon between 1939 and 1945. One type was successfully used in the invasion of France in May 1940. More were used on the Eastern Front against Soviet forces from 1941 until the end of the war in 1945.
15 replies on “10.5 cm leFH 18/1 (Sf.) auf Geschützwagen IVb”
When will we see the art work again?
When our illustrator comes back from his break.
– TE Moderator
How long is his break?
We cannot say.
– TE Moderator
I appreciate both the art, and the articles.
Does anyone know what the name is on the side of the turret?
Schill: A German romanticized war hero from 1800.
possibly SS-Kampfgruppe Schill
Is it really shortened Pz IV chassis? Indeed the roadwheels are 6 on each sides but they’re larger than IV’s wheels.
“Two test vehicles were built. They had the confusing factory code names of V1 and V2 but had nothing to do with the later flying bomb and rocket”
Actually they were not code names, nor confusing. They were simply internal factory designations for “prototype 1” and “prototype 2” (“V” coming from German word Versuchs). Similar system was used by all vehicle manufacturers in Germany, in aircraft industry “V” stood for Versuchsflugzeug, among tank manufacturers it was probably Versuchspanzer or versuchskampfwagen.
Note that these were internal and unofficial designations for systems/variants which private firms were developing for the state; government agencies had official designations for all weapon systems which were accepted into service (see for example RLM designations for aircraft types).
These prototype numbers could go very high indeed as vehicles were developed further: for example, Ju-88 V44 was the first Ju-188.
With V-1 and V-2 (and rarely mentioned V-3 gun) “V” had another meaning: Vergeltungswaffe, or revenge/retribution weapon. These were also unofficial designations, originating from Propaganda Ministry. For example, in all official design/test/procurement documents the V-2 was referred as A-4 (Aggregat-4).
Note that the prototype “v”-numbers don’t have hyphen between letter and number(s), unlike revenge-weapons.
Thank you for another interesting article.
Thank you for taking the time to send us such an informative comment. I have made the changes to the article.
A late correction to my previous comment:
A friend of mine to whom i introduced this site commented that one sentence in my post (“Note that prototype
numbers…”) could be misunderstood, and i realized he was right. What i meant to say was that prototype V-
numbers are never written with hyphen, whereas V-weapons can be written either without hyphens (V1,V2 and
V3) or with hyphens (V-1,V-2 and V-3).
About this V-weapons terminology, well..
There really isn’t an accepted convention, various postwar writers using their personal favorite (or even
both versions simultaneously…).Apparently even the Germans themselves used both version during 1944-45.
I just checked Wikipedia and they use hyphens in their V-weapons entry. I, being familiar with prototype V-
numbers, also prefer that method (after all, there were literally thousands of different kinds of V1’s and
V2’s in Nazi Germany but only one of both V-1 and V-2) but like i said there really isn’t a wrong way to
Same hyphens/no hyphens mess applies by the way to Aggregat-designations (from A-1 to A-10, A-4 being the
well-known V-2 and A-10 the intercontinental missile to bomb USA) and aircraft designations (for example,
Fw-190 or Fw 190).
Amusingly enough, i recently checked some of my old source books and found a THIRD way to write them: in
book “Aircraft of the World War II” by Kenneth Munson (ISBN 0 7110 0344 0, original print from 1960 although
i have a reprint version from 1980) the writer spells V-1 (aka FZG-76 or Fi-103, those F-letters coming from
the manufacturer Fieseler) as V.1 with dot…
“Phrasing”,as my great hero Sterling Archer would say…
love this site and this S.P.G
I spotted a typo:
The article mentions that the vehicles were constructed from August to December of 1942. That is immediately followed up with “The 10 vehicles were accepted into the army in January 1942.” From reading the rest of the article, I think the first year was meant to be 1941.
Fixed, thank you!