WW2 Japanese Medium Tanks

Type 3 Chi-Nu

IJA tanks and armoured carsIJA (1944-45) Medium tank – 144 built

A response to the Sherman

Called the Chi-nu, this new model was devised as early as 1943, when it became apparent that even the high-velocity 47 mm (1.85 in) gun on the Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai would not be enough against the Sherman’s frontal armor.
Captured Type 3 Chi-Nu Tank Tokyo 1948
Captured Type 3 Chi-Nu Tank Tokyo 1948 (photo – 1st Lt Kingston Winget, US 24th Infantry Regiment)

Hello, dear reader! This article is in need of some care and attention and may contain errors or inaccuracies. If you spot anything out of place, please let us know!

The Type 1 Chi-He, also based on the Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai, was quite an improvement in hull construction and armor, but fielded the same gun and was not ready until 1943. The army decided to shorten the development of its successor by taking the same mass-produced Type 97 chassis, upgraded to the Type 1 standard, and house the Type 3 75 mm (2.95 in) tank gun in a new turret. The Chi-Nu seemed the right response against the Sherman, fielding a comparable gun, and was produced to some extent, but never saw combat.


The initial Army Technical Bureau program, the future Type 4 Chi-To, was not ready on schedule, accumulating problems and production delays. So much so that the army decided to produce a stopgap tank, based on the existing and improved Type 1 chassis.
The main gun itself was a stopgap weapon, derived from Type 95 field artillery gun, itself derived from the French Schneider 75 mm (2.95 in) field gun of WW1 fame. It was adapted as the Type 90 and, due to the short life of its barrel, was modified to have a lower muzzle velocity.
The gun elevation was -10 +25 degrees and had a muzzle velocity of 680 m/s (2,200 ft/s). It could defeat 90 mm (3.5 in) of armor at 100 m (110 yd) and 65 (2.56 in) at 1000 m (1100 yd). This armament was completed by a hull-mounted 7.7 mm (0.3 in) Type 97 machine gun.
Type 3 Chi-Nu Tank Tokyo 1948
A captured Type 3 Chi-Nu in Tokyo after the war. (photo taken in Tokyo 1948 – 1st Lt Kingston Winget, US 24th Infantry Regiment)
The Type 3 chassis was very similar to that of the Type 97 Chi-Ha, but slightly longer and wider, with thicker side armor and a 50 mm (1.97 in) strong frontal glacis.
The suspension counted six roadwheels sprung by two horizontal coil springs and a bell crank, with three return rollers per side. The hexagonal turret was brand new, made of welded plates, 50 mm (1.97 in) thick (front). There was a commander cupola similar to the Type 1 Chi-He and Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai, equipped with a rotatable ring arm mounting a regular Type 97 machine-gun for AA close defense.
The crew was composed of the commander, gunner, loader, driver and hull-gunner. The engine was a Mistubishi V-12 Type 100.

Production and service

The program was started in May 1943 and was completed by October, which was a record in itself. Mitsubishi was chosen for production, painfully delivering 55 vehicles in 1944 and 89 until the last days of the war, due to shortages of steel and the priority given to battleship construction.
Due to the slow delivery rate, training and the loss of sea dominance, the tanks were never sent abroad. They equipped Kyūshū and Honshū home islands’ 1st and 4th Armored Divisions based around Tokyo, with 6 tank regiments in total (around 140 tanks at the end of the war). These vehicles were kept for training, but were mostly static due to increasing gasoline shortages.
In case of the awaited Allied invasion, they would have been deployed for massed counter-attacks, but the Japanese surrender ended those prospects and the Type 3 never saw action. A single vehicle escaped scrapping and is now displayed at the JGSDF Military Ordnance Training School at Tsuchiura, Ibaraki province.
A single Chi-Nu received the Chi-To turret along with its Type 5 main gun, and it was tested at the Irago Firing Ground, being found satisfactory. However, no further vehicles were produced. After the war, this variant became known as the Chi-Nu Kai.


Family photo collection of Kingston Montgomery Winget
Japanese Tanks 1939-45 by Steven J. Zaloga
The Chi-Nu on Wikipedia.
Extra photos on the Hungarian Wikipedia page

Type 3 Chi-Nu specifications

Dimensions 6.73 x 2.87 x 2.87 m (22×9.5×9.5 ft)
Total weight, battle ready 19.1 short tons (42,000 lbs)
Crew 5 (driver, commander, gunner, loader, hull gunner/radio)
Propulsion Mitsubishi Type 100, 21.7 l, V-12 diesel, 240 hp (179 kW) @ 2,000 rpm
Speed 39 km/h (24 mph)
Armor 12 to 50 mm hull & turret (0.47-1.97 in)
Suspension Bell crank
Armament 75 mm (2.95 in) Type 3 gun
1 x Type 97 7.7 mm (0.3 in) machine-gun
Range 210 km (130 miles)
Total production 144

Standard Type 3 Chi-Nu with the army camouflage, 4th Armored Division, Kyu-Shu, late 1944.

Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai 1945
Up-gunned Type 3 Chi-Nu II, testing the Type 5 75 mm (2.95 in) Tank Gun, mid-1945.


Type 3 Chi-Nu Tank with camouflage livery and Japanese Flag identification marking (photo – Wikipedia commons)
Captured Type 3 Chi-Nu Tank with camouflage livery
Captured Type 3 Chi-Nu Tank with camouflage livery 1945 (photo – Wikipedia commons)
US 4th Armored Division captured these Type 3 Chi-Nu Tanks and others
US 4th Armored Division captured these Type 3 Chi-Nu Tanks and others (photo – Wikipedia commons)

Surviving Tank

Type 3 at Tsuchiura training school
Type 3 Chi-Nu at the JGSDF Military Ordnance Training School at Tsuchiura, Ibaraki – Credits: Wikipedia
Poster Imperial Japanese Army ww2
Get the Poster of the ww2 Imperial Japanese Army Tanks and support us !

By David.B

Tank Encyclopedia's Creator, webmaster and illustrator since 2010.

8 replies on “Type 3 Chi-Nu”

The upgunned version of Chi-Nu showed in the illustration should be the Chi-Nu II and not Chi-Nu Kai.
Chi-Nu II was just rearmed with Type 5 75mm tank gun and everything else remains the same while Chi-Nu Kai was an experimental tank testing with Type 5 gun AND a Chi-To prototype turret.

We are aware of this, however this article was published some time ago and our illustrators have not had an opportunity to correct the illustration due to ongoing work on other articles. We will resolve the issue when sufficient time is available
Thankyou for your assistance
-T E Moderator

Type 3 Chi-Nu held a crew of 6, not 5. Due to the design of the tank gun (derived from the Type 90 field gun) the firing device(lanyard) is on the right side of the turret while the optics are on the left side of the turret. Thus it takes a gunner on the left, a loader, a second gunner and a commander to operate in the turret properly(the other two is in the hull).

This is from a Japanese military magazine called “丸(Maru)” issue No.800, page 71. It said two gunners are needed to aim and fire the gun.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *