German Tanks of WW2

Light, medium & heavy tanks, armored cars
Around 90,000 armored vehicles by May 1945

Heavy tanks

Panzerkampfwagen III

Panzerkampfwagen IV

Panzerkampfwagen V

Other Medium Tanks

Panzerkampfwagen II

Other Light Tanks

Reconnaisance Tanks

Assault guns

Tank destroyers

Artillery SPGs


Armored cars



Other vehicles

Light Tank Prototypes & Projects

Medium Tank Prototypes & Projects

Heavy Tank Prototypes & Projects

Assault Gun & Tank Destroyer Prototypes & Projects

Self Propelled Artillery Prototypes & Projects

Other Prototypes

Improvised vehicles

Fake tanks

AT weapons

German-related tactic articles

German-related tech articles

Aftermath of the Versailles treaty

During WW1, after the initial shock, the Germans paid little attention to the idea of tanks in trench warfare. They mostly relied on special infantry units to perform breakthroughs, like the famous Sturmtruppen. It was thought that tanks were too vulnerable1. However, after the successes of isolated British tanks, which made their way into German lines, they first began to consider an appropriate response, and then a tank of their own. The A7V, a mobile fortress, was their only successful attempt in this direction, and only a handful were produced until the armistice. Several light tanks were also considered, but none reached production in time. In 1919, the drastic Versailles treaty imposed severe limitations on military personal and material, and it also forbade tank construction. Only a handful armored cars were retained for police duties.

Later on, in 1933, maneuvers incorporated “dummy tanks”, until the industry would be ready to work on the first indigenous model. Many models were developed in Sweden or the Soviet Union, earning some much valued experience. In 1934, the first Panzerkampfwagen I was issued to the Wehrmacht, with the ordnance (Waffenamt) designation Sd.Kfz. 101. Two years later, the German tank force was augmented by the Panzer II and the first Panzer IIIs. There were capable against the armored vehicles of neighboring powers, like Czechoslovakia and Poland, but not against those of France, and even less against the USSR.

Panzer development (1936-45)

Tanks available prior to the Campaign of France (1940)

The Panzer I and II were considered transitional models, designed for training and to prepare the industry for future, more advanced, vehicles. Despite this, they were forced into combat, mostly as scout vehicles. The Panzer II remained in service for quite a long time. But the real game changer was the Panzer III. After a long elaboration, both technical and theoretical, this first true German medium tank entered mass production quite late, with the Ausf. E/F versions in 1939. Until the Ausf. L upgrade, all mounted the same 37 mm (1.46 in) main gun, completely inefficient against the well armored medium tanks of the Allies, and the armor was quite weak. But these drawback were compensated by many other qualities, including reliability, speed, a radio and a three-man turret.

The Panzer III, after armor and gun upgrades, formed the bulk of the Wehrmacht, until late 1942. By then, another model became available in great numbers, the Panzer IV. Conceived by Guderian and developed in 1936 as a support medium tank (Begleitwagen), it was available in limited quantities during the battle of France, but formed a large part of the Wehrmacht in the summer of 1941, during Operation Barbarossa. It borrowed many components from the Panzer III, but mounted a 75 mm (2.95 in) howitzer intended to deal against fortified positions. In this Wehrmacht duo, the Panzer III was intended to deal with other tanks, while the Panzer IV provided infantry support. But as the limitations of the former became evident, the latter was quickly upgraded with long-barrel, high velocity AT guns. This model became the mainstay of the German armor until 1945.

Operation Barbarossa: The Eastern Front (1941-42)

When German officers received alarming reports of Soviet “invincible tanks”, investigation followed on some captured KV-1s and T-34s. For the first time, an unpleasant feeling of inferiority spread through the Wehrmacht, especially after the merciless winter of December 1941-February 1942. Under the insistence of Hitler and Eastern Front generals, two new design were quickly put on the drawing board. The Panzer V, also called the Panther, and the Tiger, or Panzer VI were meant as an answer to the shortcomings of their predecessors. Both were equipped with excellent guns. The Tiger’s KwK 36 was an adapted anti-aircraft gun, with ultra-high velocity, excellent range and new specially crafted armor-piercing and hollow-charge shells, notably the costly tungsten rounds. Both tanks first appeared after a year and a half development, and they were ready in time for the battle of Kursk, in July 1943. They gave cold sweats to the Russian tank crews, as well as the Allies later, in Italy and France.

New generation: Panther and Tiger (1943)

Both the Tiger and the Panther were, on paper, some of the best designs in the world when they came into service. However, both of them suffered from serious teething problems due to them being rushed into production and to the front lines. The Panther became the second most produced German tank of the war, but neither of these vehicles was produced to the numbers reached by the Allied tanks. While this is generally attributed to a German “quality is better than quantity” thinking, it was actually due to a long list of factors, ranging from demographics, war bombing, the way the German industry was set up and German military thinking.

Costs speak for themselves. While a Panther was only a little more costly than a Panzer III (117,000 RM vs 91,000 RM) the Tiger was twice as costly (250,000-300,000 RM). The very early series, still incorporating uniquely designed parts and accumulated development costs, were probably up to eight times more costly than the average StuG. But, with parts commonality and simplification, new modular production methods, and a huge, expendable forced labor force (from concentration camps), a significant numbers of each model was built until the end of the war. If the Panther was the most cost-effective German AFV, and perhaps the most effective tank of WW2, the Tiger made such an impression, that it quickly shaped its own legend, besides any propaganda effort. For its time, it was a hardened steel mobile bunker, equipped with one of the most awe-inspiring guns of the war, the German anti-aircraft 88 mm (3.46 in). The before feared T-34 and many Allied tanks, including the M4 Sherman, were now easy targets from up to three miles away. With limited availability, this machine was only given to young, highly motivated crews.

The Tiger had serious tendencies to breakdown, was slow and had a limited range due to very high consumption figures. The complicated drivetrain was difficult to repair, as were the tracks. Moreso, Tigers disabled and abandoned were often lost for good, as towing was difficult. However, the large tracks were an advantage on soft grounds (snow and mud), lowering ground pressure. In fact both tanks incorporated a great deal of wartime learnt improvements.

Turretless Panzers: A misjudged success story

Both the Panzer III and IV were quite expensive, and new mass-producible, cheaper variants for infantry support and tank-hunting were sought. The most expensive part of these models, the turret, was replaced by a new, lowered hull, in the StuG III and IV, and their tank-hunter equivalents. Ultimately, with versions equipped with the 75 mm (2.95 in) short-barrel howitzer or AT guns like the Pak 40, the StuGs formed a growing part of the AFV production by 1943, and were the unsung metal heroes, the jacks-of-all-trade of the Wehrmacht. More robust, more difficult to hit, easier to repair, they added their numerical advantage, with no sacrifice to quality. The average cost of the StuG III was 80,000 RM, compared to 95,000 for a regular Panzer III. With 9400 StuG IIIs, 1200 StuH IIIs and 1100 StuG IVs, more were built than any other German tank or SPG of the war. Some StuGs were used extensively as tank-hunters, and proved more lethal even than the Tiger, with some 20,000 kills credited to these small hunters. They simply used shorter range and ambush tactics, enabled by their lower silhouette, easy to camouflage.

Panzerjägers: Hunting spirit

As soon as the fall of Poland, German planners thought of converting existing platform in order to mount heavier ordnance than the regular 37 mm (1.46 in) PaK 36, especially to deal with the well protected French and British tanks during the upcoming campaigns. At this point, they looked upon the excellent Czech AT 47 mm gun (1.85 in), already available in quantity, and mounted it on the Panzer I chassis. Soon after, the elderly Panzer II chassis was chosen to carry the 7.5 cm (2.95 in) PaK, as the Marder II, as did some captured French models (Marder I). The Czech 38(t) provided two other variants, Marder III and the famous Jagdpanzer 38(t) (ubiquitously and incorrectly known as the Hetzer). The Panzer IV chassis allowed the construction of a low-profile turretless vehicle using the StuG recipe, armed with with a long barrel high velocity PaK 39, the Jagdpanzer IV. Attempts to use the deadly 88 mm (3.46 in) gave birth to several other variants.

The Nashorn (also called Hornisse), was an adaptation of the Panzer IV chassis with said gun. The later stages of the war gave birth to more advanced vehicles, like the Jagdpanther, Elefant, and Jagdtiger. The latter, only produced in small numbers, was equipped with the most awesome piece of anti-tank artillery ever carried during the war, a 128 mm (5 in) gun. The tank itself, weighing nearly 72 tons, had a high consumption, suffered a lot of breakdowns, and was tactically difficult to move, as it was forbidden from crossing many bridges.

Later Panzers and the defensive war (1944-45)

Numbers alone were not enough during WWII. In face of odds rarely encountered by an army, of ten to one numerical inferiority on almost every front in 1944-45, the Germans slowly gave way until the end, while exacting heavy tolls on the Allies. But the ultimate defeat was quickened thanks to a near total air superiority and new Allied tank-hunters. The British 6-pdr gun proved lethal against the Axis war machines, and was subsequently employed by many US and British tank destroyers. The Soviets were able to field many SU-85s and SU-100s in 1943, also equipped with an adapted, former AA gun. The next generation tanks, the T-34/85, IS-1 and IS-2, also came en masse in 1944. Thus, some some real killing power was added to the numerical advantage on Soviet side.

Despite the lack of resources required to produce even the Tigers, Hitler insisted for more gargantuan models. As soon as 1943, a replacement for the Panzer VI was designed. An even more impressive heavy tank, the Tiger II or Königstiger. This nearly 70 tons monster incorporated some features from the Panther and an even more powerful and lethal gun. As the engines were still not up to the task, mobility was, once again, an issue. Plus, these new tanks were even more costly, and the Allied bombardment campaign began to take its toll. As the future in the east looked bleaker, Hitler and his generals looked west. The plan was simple and daring. All available Panzer VIs, one of Hitler’s cherished “Wunderwaffe”, were supposed to be gathered in a single Panzer division, the spearhead of a new unstoppable force. The objective was to pierce the weakest point of the US sector defensive line, in the Ardennes, in Belgium, and once again achieve the 1940 masterstroke, a rush to the sea, ultimately cutting off the supplies of the Allied forces. The ultimate goal was, in Hitler’s mind, to negotiate, in favorable terms, a separate peace with the western powers, and to concentrate all efforts on the Eastern front.

Last projects

The Panzer VII was named the “Löwe”, a 76-90 ton heavy tank, of which none were built. The project was cancelled. Another Hitler “Wunderwaffe” was a super-heavy tank named at first “Mammuth”, but then, by derision, “Maus”. Weighing close to 200 tons, powered by a gargantuan diesel and sporting a monstrous 128 mm (5 in) gun, this was the ultimate Wagnerian war machine. However, with long-lasting trials, relatively weak performance, and many problems to cope with, like huge consumption, slow speed, weak maneuvering capabilities and ultra-high cost, the entire project was cancelled in 1944. Other even more impressive giants never hopped of the drawing board, like the P1000 “Ratte”, also known as the “Landkreuzer”. This gigantic “land cruiser” was, on paper, propelled by two U-Boat diesel engines, and armed with a naval battleship turret, firing two 280 mm (11 in) guns, with a 128 mm turret and quite an impressive array of AA artillery. It was a late rebirth of the very early tank concepts of tanks, inspired by H.G. Wells’ novel.

Another project was the E 100, supposedly a lighter and faster version of the “Maus”, but, weighin 140 tons, it was still unrealistic in 1944. A single prototype was captured by the British before reaching completion. But the all-category champion was the P-1500 “Monster”, a 1500 ton gun carriage fielding no less than the Schwerer Gustav, able to fire a 800 mm (31.5 in) shell at 39 km. A big waste of resources was used to forge the superhuman, oversized tracks (more or less similar to those used later by NASA Saturn V pod carrier), which were all that remained of it.

Featured AT guns

From 1933 to 1945, the Wehrmacht took delivery to tens of thousands of antitank guns, from the puny standard 37 mm to the legendary 8.8 cm Pak 43 extrapolated from the AA gun.

PAK-36: 12,000 were built of this light standard infantry AT gun which was the ordnance main issue. Infamously called “door-knocker device” in the 1940 campaign because of its poor perforlances against heavily-armored allied tanks, it was sufficient against lighter armoured vehicle and stayed into service to the last day of the war, recycled to fire shaped-charges like the Stielgränat 41.
Read More

The wartime German arsenal comprised in all 15 models registered, like the unusual 2.8 cm sPzB 41, the very common 7.5 cm Pak 40, or the
fearful 8.8 cm Pak 43.

sPzB41 antitank gun
-2.8 cm sPzB 41: Basically a super-high velocity tapering barrel gun of “real” 20mm caliber. Despite this small caliber, it could launch a projectile 4,500 feet per second (1,400 m/s) at 500m, capable of piercing 52 to 69 mm of hardened steel inclined at 70° at 100m. About 2,797 were built by Mauser. It was a development of the experimental Gerlich’s coned-bore barrel 7 mm anti-tank rifle.

-4.2 cm Pak 41: Basically an airborne version of the regular Pak 36, but using the same squeeze bore principle as described above for a real final caliber of 28 mm. Only 313 were delivered. They could defeat 87 mm of straight armour at 500m.

-4.7 cm Pak 38(t): Captured Czech AT gun, which famously equipped the Panzerjäger I during the French campaign and catpured R35 tanks. Also called 4,7cm KPÚV vz. 38 originally production resumed in 1940 by Skoda Works, and its 775 m/s (2,542 ft/s) muzzle velocity gave the ability to defeat 60 mm of hardened steel (2.4 in) @ 1,200 metres (1,300 yd).

-4.7 cm Pak 181(f): Captured french AT gun originally called 47 mm APX anti-tank gun which also equipped the Char B1 and S35. It had a 855 m/s (2,805 ft/s) muzzle velocity.

-7.5 cm Panzerabwehrkanone 97/38: Captured French AT gun (the venerable 1898 “soixante-quinze”) was declined as an AT gun with pneumatic tires and tailored shield. Originally 4500 Canon de 75 Mle 1897/33s were in service in WW2 in France alone, and it was also the main dual-purpose gun of the Polish Army. The Germans have these modified by a new muzzle brake and mounted on a 5 cm Pak 38 carriage, then sent to the Eastern front. But they lacked modern AP shells and had a low muzzle velocity. The unmodified ones were named in German service 7.5 cm Pak 97/38(f).

-5 cm Pak 38: Early standard German AT gun (9500+) produced by Rheinmetall until 1945. Best results obtained with Panzergranate 40 APCR shots with a hard tungsten core. Muzzle velocity 550-1,130 m/s (1,804-3,707 ft/s), 3000 yards range.

-7.5 cm Pak 40: German standard WW2 AT Gun, more than 20,000 built until 1945. Effective at 1,800 metres (5,906 ft) in direct fire, with the APCR round muzzle velocity was 933 m/s, it could penetrate 154 mm of straight hardened steel at 500m. Rounds in use were the PzGr. 39, PzGr. 40 and PzGr. 38 HL/B (HE shell). Was used also by Finland and Hungary.

-7.5 cm Pak 41: Krupp Semi-experimental (150 built until 1943) and using the Gerlich principle: Real diameter was 55mm. With the AP round muzzle velocity was 1,230 m/s (4,035 ft/s), and it was effective at 2200 yards. It could penetrate 172 mm @30° at 500m.

-7.5 cm Pak 42: Also used on the Panther (Kwk 42). Can use the Panzergranate 39/42 (Pzgr. 39/42), Panzergranate 40 (Hk) (Pzgr. 40/42) and Sprenggranate 42 (Sprgr. 42) (HE). Best performances with the Pzgr. 40/42 (APCR) reaching 1,130 m/s (3,700 ft/s), penetrating 234 at 500m. Prod?

-7.62 cm Pak 36(r): Captured Soviet gun, about 560 converted. These 76-mm divisional guns model 1936 (F-22) were originally designed as field gun but with AT capabilities in mind. Best performances were obtained with the German-built 7.62 cm Pzgr.40, which can penetrate 158mm of 60° hardened steel at 500m and more.

-8 cm PAW 600: Semi-experimental high-low pressure gun firing hollow charges, developed by Rheinmetall. 260 Built 1943-44. Could fire at 520 m/s (1,706 ft/s) and 700m effective range and armor penetration was 140mm of vertical armor with a common shaped-charge 8 cm W Gr Patr H1 4462.

88 cm Pak 43
-8.8 cm Pak 43:
AT adaptation by Krupp and Rheintemall of the legendary anti-aircraft 88mm gun. Produced to about 2,100 until 1945. Use a tailored carriage of the cruciform quad mount. Effective at 2000m and more in almost flat trajecories it could fire indirectly at 15,000m. Could fire the versatile Pzgr. 39/43 APCBC-HE (can penetrate 185 mm at 500m) or the Pzgr. 40/43 APCR (penetration 217mm at 500m, up to 153 mm at 2000m with almost 50% first hit capability.
8,8 cm PAK 43

-12.8 cm Pak 44: Most massive AT gun in use by the Werhmacht, produced by Krupp to just 51 unit until 1945. Variation of the type used on the Jagdtiger. Can fire about the same ammunitions and figures similar to the 8.8 cm Pak 43 but long range results were better. It was capable to penetrate 230 millimetres (9.1 in) 30° at 1000 m. Used a quad (two axles), two-legged mount.

-Recoiless guns: 7.5 cm LG 40, 10.5 cm LG 40 and 10.5 cm LG 42. The latter had a muzzle velocity of 195 m/s (640 ft/s) or 335 m/s (1,099 ft/s) depending on the projectiles. These were light, portable guns for airborne units, best used against infantry as penetration power was rather poor.

-FLAK guns used in casual AT role: 2 cm Flak 30/38/Flakvierling 2 cm Gebirgsflak 38 3.7 cm Flak 18/36/37/43 5 cm Flak 41 8.8 cm Flak
18/36/37/41 10.5 cm FlaK 38 12.8 cm FlaK 40. The 88 was famously deployed in France by Rommel to stop the rampaging British Mathilda at Amiens and in several other occasions in North Africa and the Eastern Front.

Tank guns in use were the 2 cm KwK 30 (like on the panzer II), Czech 3,7cm ÚV vz. 38 (used on the Panzer 38(t), 5 cm KwK 38 5 cm, KwK 39 7.5 cm, KwK 37 7.5 cm, KwK 40 7.5 cm, KwK 42 8.8 cm and KwK 36 8.8 cm KwK 43 used from the Panzer III to the Panzer VII Königstiger.

Light tanks

Pzkpfw-II at Saumur

The Panzer II was a provisional, stopgap model, which was mostly used as a scout tank during the war. Late models, like the “Luchs” (Ausf. L), shared nothing but the name with the previous versions.

Panzer I (1934)

1493 built. Two MG 34 machine-guns. The main variants were the Ausf. A and B, and the wartime variants C and F were built in limited numbers. Four variants emerged, a command tank, a SPH (sIG 33 Bison), an AA tank (Flakpanzer I) and a tank-hunter (Panzerjäger I).

Panzer II (1935)

1856 built. One 20 mm (0.79 in) autocannon, one MG 34. It consisted of a preseries, the Ausf. A/B/C main variants, while the wartime variants F and L (Luchs) were built in small numbers. The J was heavily armored. Many derivatives emerged, including a tank-hunter (Marder II), a gun motor carriage (Wespe), a howitzer heavy motor carriage (sIG-33 Bison) and a flame-thrower version (Flamingo).

Medium tanks

Early type Panzer III in Greece, May 1941.
The Panzer III was, until 1942, the mainstay of the German armor. However, because it was unable to house bigger, longer barrel guns, it was replaced by the Panzer IV as the German main battle tank. Production of models based on its chassis flourished, notably with the StuGs series. In this photo, New Zealand prisoners pass near a Panzer III command version of the 2.Pz.Div. in Greece, near Pandelejmon, April, 16, 1941.

Panzer III (1936)

5774 built, One 37 mm (1.46 in), 50 mm (1.97 in) or 75 mm (2.95 in) gun and three MG 34s. Ausf A to N variants, plus command tanks, special versions and derivatives (StuG III, tank hunters and howitzer motor carriages).

Panzer IV (1936)

8800 built, One 75 mm (2.95 in) short barrel howitzer or long-barrel gun, and two MG 34s. Ausf A to J variants, plus Brummbär (Sturmpanzer) heavy gun carriage, Jagdpanzer IV tank-hunter, StuG IV and Wirbelwind AA version.

Panzer V Panther (1942)

6000+ built, One 75 mm (2.95 in) KwK 42 L/70 gun, two MG-34s. Ausf. D, A and G variants. Tank hunter derivative (Jagdpanther).

Heavy tanks

Panzer VI Tiger, Northern France, 1944.
A Panzer VI Tiger of the 101st Abteilung in Northern France, late 1944. The Tiger was probably the most feared machine in the German arsenal. Its armor ranged from 100 to 120 mm (3.93-4.72 in) and the velocity and range of the 88 mm (3.46 in) gun gave its crew immense confidence in combat. Allied tanks were seen as sitting ducks. Some of its commanders became aces, like the famous Michael Wittman.

Panzer VI Tiger (1942)

1347 built, One 88 mm (3.46 in) KwK 36, two MG 42s. Ausf H and E variants.

Panzer VI Ausf. B Königstiger (1943)

492 built, One 88 mm (3.46 in) gun, two MG 42s. Jagdtiger tank-hunter derivative.

Durchsbruchswagen II or Prototype DW 2, as delivered with the Krupp Turm (1940).

VK 36.01
Prototype VK 36.01 chassis, Kummersdorf testing ground, fall 1941.

Prototype VK 45.01
Prototype VK 45.01 (1942), Porsche Tiger prototype.

The only Porsche Tiger in active service with Abt.653, Ukraine, June 1944.

Super heavy tanks

Panzer VIII Maus (1944)

2 built (prototypes) One 128 mm (5.03 in) and one 75 mm (2.95 in) gun. Cancelled.

P.1000 Ratte (1942)

Project of a “landkreuzer” of 1000 tons, cancelled.

Tank destroyers (Panzerjäger)


The awesome Jagdtiger. Only a handful of these beasts were ever produced, and their weight made them near-impractical. Engine limitations led to a lot of breakdowns. But when in place, their protection, firepower and range were unrivaled until the end of the war – Credits: Wikipedia.

Panzejäger I (1940)

202 built, based on Panzer I wit one 47 mm (1.85 in) gun.

Marder I (1942)

170 built, based on a Lorraine 37L, Hotchkiss H39 or FCM 36 chassis. One 75 mm (2.95 in) gun.

Sd.Kfz. 132 Marder II (1942-43)

201 built or converted, based on the Panzer II Ausf. D/E. 76.2 mm (3 in) PaK 36(r) gun.

Sd.Kfz. 131 Marder II (1943-45)

651 built or converted, based on the Panzer II Ausf. A/B/C and F. One 75 mm (2.95 in) PaK 40 gun.

– Marder III (1942-43)

363 built, based on the Czech 38(t) chassis. One 75 mm (2.95 in) PaK 40 gun.
Marder III
One of the three variants of the Marder III, based on the excellent Panzer 38(t) chassis manufactured by BMM (Skoda). The Ausf.M was built on one of the later chassis, sharing the front engine configuration with the Grille Ausf.M. Like the other Marder IIIs, it was armed by the standard 7,5 cm Pak 40, and not with the Russian Soviet 76.2 mm field gun of the first Marders. This gun was found able to penetrate the armor of the T-34 and KV-1 at that time. The gun was mounted in a rear casemate, with its own shield for added protection. It was emerging from a large opening in the frontal armor for better traverse. It also had a lower profile, and was also the most largely produced, with 942 vehicles from May 1943 to May 1944.

Sturmgeschütz IV (1942-44)

1139 built, based on the Panzer IV chassis. One 75 mm (2.95 in) PaK 40 gun.

Jagdpanzer IV (1943-45)

2000 built, based on the Panzer IV chassis. One 75 mm (2.95 in) PaK 42 gun.

Jagdpanzer 38(t) (1944-45)

2827 built, based on the Czech 38(t) chassis. One 75 mm (2.95 in) gun.

Nashorn (1943-44)

473 built, based on Panzer III/IV chassis. One 88 mm (3.46 in) gun.

Elefant (1943)

91 built, based on the rejected Porsche Tiger chassis. One 88 mm (3.46 in) gun.

Jagdpanther (1944-45)

415 built, based on the Panzer V Panther chassis. One 88 mm (3.46 in) gun.

– Jagdtiger (1944-45)

88 built, based on the Panzer VI Königstiger chassis. One 128 mm (5 in) gun.

– Sturer Emil (1942-43)

2 built, based on a Henschel chassis with a 128 mm (5 in) gun.

Gun motor carriages

sIG-33 Bison (1940)

38 built, based on Panzer I. One 155 mm (6.1 in) howitzer.

15 cm sIG 33 auf Fahrgestell Panzerkampfwagen II (Sf) (1941)

Also incorectly known as the Sturmpanzer II or Bison II. 12 built, based on the Panzer II.

Sd.Kfz.124 Wespe (1941-42)

682 built, based on the Panzer II. One sIG 33 155 mm (6.1 in) howitzer.

– StuIG 33B (1941)

24 built (Sturm-Infanteriegeschütz 33B), based on the Panzer III. One 155 mm (6.1 in) howitzer.

StuG III (1942-45)

9408 built, based on the Panzer III, with a 75 mm (2.95 in) gun.

– StuH 42 (1942-44)

1211 built (Sturmhaubitze 42) , based on the Panzer III, with a 105 mm (4.13 in) howitzer.

– Sturmpanzer IV Brummbär (1944-45)

306 built, based on the Panzer IV, with a 150 mm (5.9 in) StuH 43 howitzer.

Sturmtiger (1943-44)

19 built (Sturmmörserwagen 606/4 mit 38 cm RW 61), based on the Tiger, with a 380 mm (15 in) rocket launcher.

Karl mortar (1940-42)

Karl Gerät

7 built. The epitome of the self-propelled gun during the war, only seven units of this gargantuan self-propelled siege mortar were built between 1940 and 1942, but its development goes back to 1937. Originally, Rheinmetall proposed a super-heavy howitzer to attack the Maginot Line. It was decided to make it self-propelled in January 1937, using very long, large tracks and a Daimler-Benz MB 503A gasoline or Daimler-Benz MB 507C diesel engine, which supplied between 4 and 4.8 hp/ton depending on the model. All seven were almost tailor-made and weighed around 120-125 tons, armed with a 600 mm (24 in) howitzer. Each shell weighted almost a ton and was given a 500 kg warhead. Mobility was limited, and it relied on a trailer and crane for ammo. It could also be disassembled and loaded on a special train for long distance transport.

– P1500 Monster (1944)

Paper project only, a self-propelled gun intended to carry the huge 800 mm (31.5 in) “Dora”.

Armored scouts & transports

Kübelwagen (1940-45)

50,435 built. Famous VW off-road car.

– Schwimmwagen (1942-44)

20,000 built. Derivative VW amphibious car.

Sd.Kfz. 221-223 series (1935-44)

3340 built. Leichter Panzerspähwagen (4 wheels).

Sd.Kfz. 231 6-rad series (1934-40)

200 built. Schwerer Panzerspähwagen (Heavy armored scout – 6 wheels).

– Sd.Kfz. 231 8-rad series (1936-44)

1200 built. Schwerer Panzerspähwagen (Heavy armored scout – 8 wheels).

Sd.Kfz. 247 Panzerbefehlswagen (1937-45)

68 built. 4/6 wheeled armored command car.

Sd.Kfz. 250 (1941-45)

13,000 built. Armored half-tracks.

– Sd.Kfz. 251 Hanomag (1942-45)

15,252 built. Main German APC of the war.

– Sd.Kfz. 254 (1938-40)

140 built. Armored wheel/track hybrid artillery observation vehicle.

SdKfz 254 Poland
SdKfz 254 in Poland, September 1939

SdKfz 254 DAK
SdKfz 254 in North Africa, 1941

Anti-Aircraft vehicles

Flakpanzer I (1941)

25 built. This rare conversion appeared in 1941, after it became apparent that towed Flak guns were unable to protect moving Panzer columns. This was a conversion of the obsolete Panzer I Ausf B chassis with a 2 cm FlaK 38 L/112.5. 25 were converted by Stowever and used by the 614th Motorized Flak Battalion in Romania.

-Flakpanzer 38(t) Gepard (1943)

141 built. This derivative of the prolific Czech Panzer 38(T) was armed with a 20 mm (0.79 in) Flak 38. The Waffenamt designation was Flakpanzer 38(t) auf Selbstfahrlafette 38(t) Ausf.M (SdKfz 140), or Flakpanzer 38(t) Gepard. Given organically, after early 1944, to the AA platoons of each Panzerbatallion.

-Möbelwagen (1944)

250 built by Deutsche Eisenwerke until 1945. Based on the Panzer IV (Flakpanzer IV), armed with a 3.7 cm FlaK 43 L/89 in an open platform.

-Wirbelwind (1944)

87 to 105 built by Ostbau Werke in Silesia (diverging sources). Quad 20 mm Flakvierling 38 in an open turret based on the Panzer IV chassis.

-Ostwind (1944)

43-44 built. Similar model by the same manufacturer, but armed with a single 3.7 cm FlaK 43 L/89.

-Kugelblitz (1945)

2-6 built The Flakpanzer IV Kugelblitz was armed with a fully enclosed turret with Zwillingsflak 30mm MK 103 twin anti-aircraft guns. Only a handful were built at the end of the war.


Achtung Panzer

Germans Tanks of ww2
Germans Tanks of ww2


Sd.Kfz.263 of Nachr.Abt.37 (Mot.), 1st Panzerdivision, Poland, September 1939
Sd.Kfz.263 of Nachr.Abt.37 (Mot.), 1st Panzerdivision, Poland, September 1939
Sd.Kfz.263 Funkspähwagen, Deutsches Afrikakorps, 1941
Sd.Kfz.263 Funkspähwagen, Deutsches Afrikakorps, 1941
Sd.Kfz.263, 2nd Division
Sd.Kfz.263, 2nd Division “das Reich”, Eastern Front, 1941

Sd.Kfz.263, 79th signal battalion (mot.) 4th Panzerdivision, Bielorussia 1943.
Sd.Kfz.263 “Rona”, Warsaw, 1944.

Grille Ausf.H, 9/Pz.Gren.Rgt 113, Russia 1943
Grille Ausf.H, 9th Kompanie, 113th Panzergrenadier Regiment, Russia, 1943.
Sd.Kfz. 138/1 Grille H, 9/PzGrenadier Regiment 2, 2 Panzerdivision, Normandy, summer 1944
Sd.Kfz.138/1 Grille Ausf.H, 9th Kompanie, Panzergrenadier Regiment 2, 2nd Panzerdivision, Normandy, summer 1944.
Grille Ausf.H 9/Pz.Gren.Rgt 9/67 or 26, 26th Panzerdivision, Italy 1944
Grille Ausf.H of the Panzergrenadier Regiment 9/67 or 26, 26th Panzerdivision, Italy, 1944.
Grille Ausf H, 9/Pz.Gren.Rgt 901, Russia 1944.
Grille Ausf.H, Panzergrenadier Regiment 901, Russia, 1944.
15 cm Schweres Infanteriegeschütz 33/1 auf Selbstfahrlafette 38(t) (Sf) Ausf.K (Sd.Kfz. 138/1).
Grille Ausf M, unknown unit, Russia 1944.
Grille Ausf.K, unknown unit, Russia, 1944.
Grille Ausf M, East Prussia 1945.
Grille Ausf.K, East Prussia, 1945.
Munitionspanzer 38(t) (sf) Ausf.K
Munitionspanzer 38(t) (sf) Ausf.K (Sd.Kfz.138/1), Germany, May 1945.

Sd.Kfz.231 6 rad
Sd.Kfz.231 6-rad from the third PanzerDivision, Neuropinn, May 1936. Click to see an earlier model from the VIth Armeekorps.
Sd.Kfz,231 6 rad during the Anschluss
Unidentified Sd.Kfz.231 6 rad during the Anschluss, 1938.
Sd.Kfz.232 6 rad
Sd.Kfz.232 (fu) radio version in Poland, September 1939.

Sd.Kfz.247 Ausf.A
Ausf.A, France, May 1940. The long Waffenamt designation was “Schwerer geländegängiger gepanzerter Personenkraftwagen (6 Rad) mit Fahrgestell des l gl.Lkw”.
Sd.Kfz.247 Ausf.B, Ukraine
Ausf.B, Ukraine, summer 1942. Long designation was “Schwerer geländegängiger gepanzerter Personenkraftwagen”
Sd.Kfz.247 Ausf.B reconstitution
Supposedly an Ausf.B in Russia, fall 1942. The camouflage is based on one of the reconstitutions made.
Sd.Kfz.247 Ausf.B in Normandy 1944
Ausf.B, possibly used by the SS, Normandy, summer 1944.

Steyr ADGZ
SS-Heimwehr “Danzig”, September 1939.
Steyr ADGZ in Croatia
7th SS Freiwillingen Gerbirgs Division “Prinz Eugen”, Croatia, 1943.

Sd.Kfz.4/1 on the Eastern Front
Sd.Kfz.4/1 on the Eastern Front, 1943.
Sd.Kfz.4/1 in Normandy
Sd.Kfz.4/1 in Normandy, summer 1944.
Sd.Kfz.4/1 in winter livery
Sd.Kfz.4/1, Eastern front, winter 1944-45.
Munitionskraftwagen Sd.Kfz.4
Munitionskraftwagen für Nebelwerfer Sd.Kfz.4, Eastern front, 1944.

Type 182 in France 1940
Type 182 in France 1940
Kübelwagen in Russia 1942
Kübelwagen in Russia 1942
Type 182 in North Africa, Afrika Korps 1941
Type 182 in North Africa, Afrika Korps 1941
Kubelwagen Ambulance
Kubelwagen Ambulance
Kübelwagen in Tunisia 1943
Kübelwagen in Tunisia 1943
Kübelwagen in Russia 1943
Kübelwagen in Russia 1943
Camouflaged Kübelwagen Normandy summer 1944
Camouflaged Kübelwagen Normandy summer 1944
Kübelwagen with MG.34 mount, 1944
Kübelwagen with MG.34 mount, 1944

An Afrika Korps Schwimmwagen, Egypt, june 1942.
An eastern front schwimmwagen, Pripet marshes (Russia), august 1941.
A Wehrmacht Schwimmwagen in Normandy, june 1944, with the most current camouflage, with dark green and dark brown vermicels on a beige-brown basis.

One of the very first serial SdkFz 2, Germany, december 1940.
An Afrika korps kettenkrad, Libya, october 1942.
An eastern front Kettenkrad, Stalingrad, december 1942.
A SS Panzergrenadiere Kettenkrad, Normandy, june 1944.

Pak 36
The Panzerabwehrkanone model 36, standard infantry gun of the german army 1937-42.
Kettenkrad Pak 36
Kettenkrad towing the Pak 36, 24th Infantry Division (army group center), Vitebsk sector, Russia, june 1942.
Pak 36
A PAK 36 with Stielgränat 41, Belgium (operation Wacht am Rhein), december 1944.

German Prime movers (half tracks)

german prime movers ww2

Red Army Auxiliary Armoured Vehicles, 1930–1945 (Images of War)

Red Army Auxiliary Armoured Vehicles, 1930–1945 (Images of War), by Alex Tarasov

If you ever wanted to learn about probably the most obscure parts of the Soviet tank forces during the Interwar and WW2 – this book is for you.

The book tells the story of the Soviet auxiliary armor, from the conceptual and doctrinal developments of the 1930s to the fierce battles of the Great Patriotic War.

The author not only pays attention to the technical side, but also examines organizational and doctrinal questions, as well as the role and place of the auxiliary armor, as it was seen by the Soviet pioneers of armored warfare Mikhail Tukhachevsky, Vladimir Triandafillov and Konstantin Kalinovsky.

A significant part of the book is dedicated to real battlefield experiences taken from Soviet combat reports. The author analyses the question of how the lack of auxiliary armor affected the combat efficacy of the Soviet tank troops during the most significant operations of the Great Patriotic War, including:

– the South-Western Front, January 1942
– the 3rd Guards Tank Army in the battles for Kharkov in December 1942–March 1943
– the 2nd Tank Army in January–February 1944, during the battles of the Zhitomir–Berdichev offensive
– the 6th Guards Tank Army in the Manchurian operation in August–September 1945

The book also explores the question of engineering support from 1930 to the Battle of Berlin. The research is based mainly on archival documents never published before and it will be very useful for scholars and researchers.
Buy this book on Amazon!

German Panzer IV Tank – Tank Encyclopedia Support Shirt

German Panzer IV Tank – Tank Encyclopedia Support Shirt

Blitz into action with this Pzkpfw IV, aka Panzer 4 shirt! A portion of the proceeds from this purchase will support Tank Encyclopedia, a military history research project. Buy this T-Shirt on Gunji Graphics!

German King Tiger Tank – Tank Encyclopedia Support Shirt

German King Tiger Tank – Tank Encyclopedia Support Shirt

Get out there with the confidence of the King Tiger in this tee. . A portion of the proceeds from this purchase will support Tank Encyclopedia, a military history research project. Buy this T-Shirt on Gunji Graphics!

German Self-Propelled Artillery Guns of the Second World War
German Self-Propelled Artillery Guns of the Second World War

By Craig Moore

One towed artillery gun required a team of six horses and nine men. WW2 German engineers came up with the idea of mounting an artillery gun on top of a tank chassis. This new technology reduced the amount of resources required to deploy one artillery gun. Artillery self-propelled guns only needed a four or five man crew. They could also be made ready to fire more quickly. This book covers the development and use of this new weapon between 1939 and 1945. One type was successfully used in the invasion of France in May 1940. More were used on the Eastern Front against Soviet forces from 1941 until the end of the war in 1945.

Buy this book on Amazon!

The Second World War

Bolivian armor Bolivia
Nazi Germany
New Zealand
South Africa
Soviet Union
The Netherlands
United Kingdom

124 replies on “German Tanks of WW2”

I liked the encyclopedia of tanks from Germany. I do not see information about the Pz. SFL. IVc 8.8cm, 8.8cm PaK 43 Waffentrager Rheinmetall L71, Waffenträger auf pz. IV, Rhm.-Borsig Waffenträger. Thanks for everything.

Those are rather obscure vehicles only made popular due to WoT. There were hundreds of German paper designs and prototypes. Have patience

Out of curiosity, were any of these “wunderrwaffe” designs ever practical to build? Not even looking at their practicality on an actual battlefield, could these have been built at any point in the war? Even early on, I imagine the Nazis would have been hard pressed to not only source material, but to actually build the thing.

It is not unfeasable to think of the E 25, 50 or 75 as entering production (the E 75 was basically a simplified Tiger II), but the E 100, the Maus or the Ratte were totally unfeasable from a production point of view. They required a lot of resources, precious metals, manpower and time to be built, and were almost assuredly not worth it.

Wunderwaffe was an umbrella term, which referred to all kinds of weapons (aircraft, rockets, naval vessels, guns, in fact, all types of weapons). Let’s stick to talking about the armoured vehicles, though. The vast majority were too big in every sense to be practical – cost too much, were physically massive, weighed too much, etc. On the far end of the scale, something like the “Ratte” or “Monster” super heavy tanks (or landships, as I like to call them) would’ve taken years to build, used up too many resources, and they would’ve been easy to destroy. Even with all the AA guns they would’ve had, a sortie of IL-2s or similar ground attack aircraft would be able to end those vehicles immediately.

Let’s look at the smaller designs – the Sturer Emil, Flakpanzer IV Kugelblitz, and the E series. Sturer Emil (a 128mm-armed, open-topped SPG) was a pretty meh design that was rushed into production. Two prototypes saw service in roughly 1943 on the Eastern Front and were not bad at all. Plenty of kills, but the chassis wasn’t great. Big, heavy, but it has to have been cheaper than a Jagdtiger.
Flakpanzer IV Kugelblitz would’ve been decent, but wasn’t exactly magnificent. Dual 30mm AA gun. Built on a Panzer IV. It was just a natural development of SPAAGs.

Like Stan Lucian said, the E series was a good idea until you consider the larger tanks. They were inevitably more expensive than most, if not all, Allied tanks, but they’d have been decent quality in small numbers. Imagine something like the stories you hear about Tiger tanks destroying columns of Allied tanks, but set in an imaginary late 1945 / 1946, and that’s probably what you’d be looking at.

Another thing to consider with regards to “practicality” is Allied innovations. I’m more of a Soviet expert, and I can tell you that they’d have had the IS-3 and T-44 to deal with the E series. Also, they were working on SPGs with insanely powerful guns. EG an ISU-152 with a high-powered 152mm gun for taking out Jagdtigers, a 130mm naval gun, etc. A few different prototypes were made based on that, but were abandoned due to the war’s end and the impracticality of a very long gun. If the war continued and we saw things like the E-50 and E-75, it’s not unreasonable to assume we’d see some enter a short-run production.
I guess the British would’ve had the Centurion. Very good chassis, and the 17pdr would’ve probably be able to deal with the E series. Similarly, the Americans had the Pershing which could deal with the heavier tanks.

TLDR: the more sensible wunderwaffe tanks would’ve been good, but more or less keeping up with the arms race.

The big problem for the German’s proposed super tanks were movement. How many roads, bridges, or railroad cars could handle them?

I noticed that you don’t have a page for the Jagdtiger. I would like to see one for it, unless you are not planning to do so. You give a lot of info in your articles, so I want to see one for the Jagdtiger. If there is already a page, please link me to it, as searching for it gave me nothing.

Hi Ade,
It’s no mystery that we still have many rockstar ww2 tanks to cover, like the Jagdpanther and Jagdtiger, M24 Chaffee, Comet and Challenger or ISU-122 for which we are paying a special attention in order to create in-depth articles worthy of what is expected by our visitors and fans. Just be patient and you will be rewarded, you can check in the meantime the huge material already available on the net.

How come the Pz.kpfw. VIII “Maus” and the VK.72.01K aren’t mentioned?
Also, is it possible if you make a page about the early German experimental light and scout tanks? Like the VK.903b, Pz. Kpfw. II Ausf. J and the Pz. Kpfw. I Ausf.C?

How can I access the first link directly from the site?
Before, I seemed to be able to do something and access this page, but now I don’t know.

SDKFZ-234 series? Cant seem to find any info in the Armoured car section. Seems a rather glaring error. otherwise so far so good.

Hello Tom,
Not yet, but i imagine the time needed to convert the website into an app would be consequent. For the moment there is no volunteer for this but that could change.

Just found this site & it looks good. Keep up the good work.

A small nit… in the blurb on Flakpanzer I above it says they were built on the B chassis. Every picture I have ever seen shows the A chassis. Maybe a typo?

I guys,

Very nice guide, but i can’t find information about the Sturer Emil (12,8 cm Selbstfahrlafette auf VK3001(H)).

well go back and looking over the nations there are plenty of armored cars but sometimes I’ll forget that they exist thanks.

Hello Leca, nice to see you there !
As a vehicle perhaps, but sooner as there is an armoured version
Here are (out of the Jagdtiger, pz35(t) or FLAKpanzers currently started or well advanced) the next long-terms planned entries in this category:
7.62 cm FK36(r) auf Panzerjäger Selbstfahrlafette Zugkraftwagen 5t (SdKfz 6/3)
3.7cm FlaK 36 auf Fahrgestell Zugkraftwagen 5t (Sd Kfz 6/2)
Sd.Kfz.7/2 3.7cm Flak 37 with Armor Cab
Sd.Kfz. 7/1 with armoured cab
Bussing-Nag 3,7 cm L/70 Kanone auf Selbstfahrlafette
Leichttraktor Vs.Kfz.31 (Versuchs Kampffahrzeug 31)
Sd.Kfz.8 mit 8.8 cm Flak 18 armored cab
Panzer Selbstfahrlafette II – 7,5 cm Kanone L/41 auf Zugkraftwagen
Bunkerflak de 88 mm auf Sonderanhaenger 201 /Zugkraftwagen 8t armoured variant
Land-Wasser-Schlepper (LWS) =NE crosspost
8.8 cm Flak 18 (Sfl.) auf Zugkraftwagen 18t (Sd.Kfz. 9)
Sd.Kfz.10/4/5 mit 2 cm FlaK 30/38
Sd.Kfz.10/5 mit 3.7 cm PaK 36/ 5 cm PaK 38 field co.
Straussler V4
SdKfz 254

Do you have any information about why exactly some prototype tanks (like Straussler V4, Leichttraktor Vs.Kfz.31) weren’t adopted and mass produced? I have been looking for some time and can’t seem to find any specific reasons, other than general ones like “they were already obsolete” without specifying in what way exactly they were obsolete. Thanks!

In the mid-1920s, the Germans built the first prototype of a tank after WW1. Grosstraktor had a 75 mm cannon designed to fight infantry and light fortifications. The next important project was a 37 mm cannon tank for anti-tank combat. This prototype is Leichttraktor. The history of the First World War repeats itself, when the heavy tank A7V was completed on the battlefield by the light tank LK.
Due to the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles, the Germans built these prototypes in great secrecy and sent them to Russia for testing. Even if they presented interesting innovations, the Soviets’ conclusion was that the L.Tr prototypes were outdated compared to the Christie tank (which will result in BT) and the Vickers Mark E (which will result in T-26) whose licenses they held.
L.Tr. it was an outdated concept and the requirements for a new tank (Panzer 3) had already been formulated on January 27, 1934.
From my point of view, due to the restrictions, German engineers needed more time to match and surpass the British and American ones.
L.Tr. and G.Tr. were obsolete as a concept in the first half of the 1930s. Also being the first prototypes, engineers gained a lot of experience that will help them develop Panzer III (instead of L.Tr.) and Panzer IV (instead of G.Tr.).
L.Tr. and G.Tr. were obsolete as a concept in the first half of the 1930s. Also being the first prototypes, engineers gained a lot of experience that will help them develop Panzer III (instead of L.Tr.) and Panzer IV (instead of G.Tr.)
For example, the F-15 is a 4th generation aircraft and the F-22 is a 5th generation aircraft. F-22 is better!

Hello Mister Taxi, actually, the famous 88 is done as an illustration, but not as an article which it would deserve. Probably in the future, as the PAK 75, 17-Pdr and others.

Thank-you for your exeptionally informative work regarding tanks. I have learned so much from your write-ups about each type of tank. Please keep up your excellent work in this regard 🙂
Kind Regards,

Why “Nazi Germany”?

Do you have a “Commie Russia”? Or a “Democratic US”??

And why is the German flag of the period censored?

How seriously do you want to be taken when you display such double standards and political bias?

Hello Pedro,
Calling “nazi germany” for the this period is a generally accepted convention, as you can see in ww1 there is a “German empire” and “ussr” means what it means. If one day we are submerged by petitions to change these we will intervene. As for the nazi flag “censored” it’s about our German audience, the svatiska in this context is forbidden in Germany. To my knowledge you are the first to do these remarks and we have some 2600 comments displayed on the website.

Right, but USSR was an official name for Russia at that time. German Empire was also a name of the country during World War I. In World War II the proper name would be “German Reich” if you want to be so historically accurate. I’m sorry but Nazi Germany is really not different from Commie Russia as pedro said earlier. And it sort of whitewashes German history, impying that it was “Nazi” and that majority of common German folk had nothing to do with the war. And censoring German flag also enforces this feeling. I can understand computer game developers (like World of Tanks) trying to censor it, because they want to sell their product, but you’re posting historical articles on this site so I would expect you to be a little more on the side of real history and not use the terms like you were some uneducated journalists (I’m not saying you are, but this is the sort of people that uses it).

“– Panzer VI Tiger (1942)

1347 built, One 88 mm (3.46 in) KwK 36, two MG 42s. Ausf H and E variants.
– Panzer VI Ausf. B Königstiger (1943)

492 built, One 88 mm (3.46 in) gun, two MG 42s. Jagdtiger tank-hunter derivative.”

Was it really possible to mount the MG 42 on tanks or is this just a typing mistake? Also, will mounted MGs, such as those that could be mounted in the cupola of Tiger E’s, Pz IV’s commander’s cupola and StuG loader’s hatch be accounted for? And also, the Jagdtiger, Jagdpanther, late variant of the Sturmpanzer IV and Elefant tanks had hull mounted MGs aswell as the Hetzer and late war StuGs had a remote controlled roof MG and some of these StuG’s even having a hole made in the mantlet for a coaxial MG, and the Jagdpanzer IV, wich had two MG ports in the early variants and a single in the late ones that could use either a MG 34 or 42

Thank you for the most informative site on German armor. I have dozens of books on German Armor, wheeled and tracked armor and soft skin vehicles. Several of the books are in German and hard to find nowadays..
In the last 40 years I have built 93 1/35 scale German models of all kinds, some of which were scratch built and many are variations.
You know just when you think you know it all about the German war machines, I ran across this site and found I still have more to learn about German prototypes and paper panzers.


I can’t find any information on the Marder III (H nor the M). Please direct me to this information? Thanks!

We do not currently have an article on the Marder III, one will be added in the Future

-TE Moderator

Fantastic site and very informative. Thought I knew a thing or two about WW2 and German Panzers but I stand corrected. Learned a lot here and would like to express my respect and admiration for your in-depth knowledge but also for the beautiful renders of the tanks themselves.

For those interested in collecting real life replicas of the tanks in scale 1/43 I would recommend this site (and they are not expensive at all).

Excellent site with loads of useful information.
Only the „Nazi Germany“ header doesn’t really sit well with me.
Well, I know it makes for a catching name and instantly shows you who the bad guys are, but honestly do you really need this?

Hello Moiterei
There has been a couple of requests indeed to change this to “germany” that i can understand perfectly. The “nazi thing” was less motivated by a “good guys-bad guys” scheme which is of course as we know not that clear, than SEO, and since it pretty much trapped the whole SEO thing. If i change the “nazi germany” i will break all the backlinks accumulated over the years and the website will immediately fall in the search results. A 301 redirection is the solution, i’m working on it 😉
The webmaster

This page was “work in progress” but, unfortunately, nobody paid it much attention.

It will be rewritten and expanded sooner rather than later

Hi i have an Bandai 1 32 Sd kfz 234 PUMA without figures.
All my collection is in 1:32 but the model looks huge compared to a Panzer Iv, and a sd kfz 231 in the same scale.
”Ok, dived the lenght by 32, and see” in your site, and by Wikipedia, the lenght is similar between sd kfz 231 and the sd kfz 234. My Puma model is bigger
But, you have an poster, where figures all armoured wwii german vehicles, and the proportion between the 231 and my ”Puma” looks like your poster.
The question is, all of the vehicles of the poster are in the same scale?
Thanks and best regards

Hello N E Lagrave
First off, the illustrations displayed here are not shown to their real scale because of the repsonsive constraints: They are all 100% of the column. So the poster is indeed more trusted because the size of all vehicles are based on specs calculated with the same system. The Puma is still quite large to my eyes compared to the 231/232 especially. But crossing the specs with those of our documentation could help to figure it out. Also the lenght is sometimes not given really “overall” but not commprising the bumpers for example. I debunked in fact some of these specs by comparing the vehicles on the same basis and using the same parts like roadwheels. That’s the advantage of digital illustration.

Out of curiosity, how many people work here and how long does it typically take to create an article?

There’s around 30 of us working on TE, with various degrees of involvement.

Article writing varies greatly depending on available sources, length, conflictual info. It can range from days to months.

Hello, I want to learn about the tanks of WW2 and I was happy when I found this website, although there is not much info on these tanks. (I have not gone to the other countries yet) I was wondering if these are being worked on? Things I would personally like to see would be stuff like the tank’s weaknesses, gun cal/shell, and speed. I was a bit disappointed when I noticed the only info on most tanks is how many were built.

Thank you!

Dude, there are like 50 different articles on German WWII tanks and Armored Fighting Vehicles on this website! Just see the list at the top of the page.

You guys do a great job with this site! Excellent resource for information! I’m sure you have a great article in the works for the Sd. Kfz. 186. But when is it going to get here?! Lol I know there are quite a few sites dedicated to just the Jagdtiger and there are many articles written about the acquisition of the remaining 3 Jagdtigers. Would just be great to see one on here!

Dear Sir:
I hope you do not get offended by, my comment; but; Why do you “cut” the cannons to some tanks?
I hope that you and all your loved ones are very well


Hello Fernando,
This was done many years ago, in order to have these ‘long’ tanks on a single column to the right of the text. We are not doing this anymore, but the old illustrations remain as they were.

Guys I have question: What happend to the German tanks Tigers (I and Konigstiger) ,Jagdtigers ,Ferdinands (Elefant) , Nashorns ,Hummels and Marders after the war ? How many vehicles of this type have survived end of war ?

I am due to have a book published in 2020 concerning the fighting in NW Germany in April 1945. I currently have no pictures of either British or German tanks and this is possibly an oversight. Could you inform me about your permissions/licensing terms and, if I can afford them (!), whether you can provide high res images.

Best wishes

Can someone identify the tank in the attached photo. The location is Poland – about 100m from where my Grandmother was borm. I expect date to be Sept 1939 after German invasion of Poland. What is the Polish ‘armour?
I don’t know if I’ve come to the right place – apologies if not.

Can you please add article about Panzer Selbsfahrlafette IVc, the one with the 8.8 cm FlaK 41 L/73?

Hello Edward,
Thank you for your suggestion. While we are aware of the Panzer Selbsfahrlafette IVc, you can put this suggestion and any others you might have into out Public Suggestion List:
As for the article on it, it will unfortunately not be soon. The Tank Encyclopedia team has decided to heavily prioritize rewriting in order to fix some issues with our older articles and also to give us some time to illustrate our existing humongous stache of ready articles.
If you want to support us writing more articles and getting to this one faster, please consider donating on our Patreon or Paypal:

I have some question, German Army classified the tank as a weight(light, medium, heavy) or just called Panzer I, II, III, ~
sorry my poor english 🙁

I don’t seem to be able to find the “Sturminfantriegeschütze 33B.” I saw it mentioned in Jason Mark’s, “Island of Fire,” p43ff. Cheers

What the hell has happened to the article covering the 12.8 cm Selbstfahrlafette auf VK3001(H) (Sturer Emil)?

There used to be a dedicated page for this impressive prototype that saw battle, 1 of which was captured at Stalingrad and is on display at Kubinka perhaps?

Anyway, I am quite annoyed that you would entertain many of the paper panzers, but neglect this iconic beast which sported a larger gun than the Jagdtiger on a chassis half it’s weight.

We never had a page on the Sturer Emil. Only on the Dicker Max.

It is within our sights, but not working on it right now.

Due to popular and vulgar documentaries from certain large media distributors/manufacturers, the term ‘Nazi Germany’, Nazi armies’, and ‘Nazi hordes’ are commonly used hyperbolic terms used only for dramatic effect.
It is time to move on from these whitewashing terms and to correctly discern between the Political entity and other German entities that were not completely ‘Nazi’.
It only serves to reinforce unhelpful stereotypes that have been disseminated since the end of WWII.
For those who have studied the rich and awe-inspiring history of Germany, from the Germanic tribes, through to the Holy Roman Empire, Prussia/Brandenburg, and finally the 1871 unification of Germany, then one discovers the abundant contribution disproportionate to their population and size in the areas of arts and sciences.
Having studied Early modern European history as well as German language, continental philosophy, literature, culture, since the early 18thC, I can tell you the Germans deserve far more respect, as their contribution to humankind well outweighs the narrow-minded, lazy approach of labelling any and all Germans existing in WWII as ‘Nazi’s.

It is not just incorrect, but indisputably false, just as not every Russian was ‘Soviet’, or every Brit a Monarchist, or democrat.

The word itself is highly loaded, insulting to existing Germans, and not of a high standard not to mention reinforces said stereotypes.

It’s time to move on.

The Germans did not invent pogroms, nor anti-semitism. Pogrom is a Russian word, and anti-semitism is old as dirt.

Well Ki, the webmaster has heard you. All mentions of “nazi germany” are to be deleted. It started, but it’s a long process on all URLs and will be completed in a week if all goes well. Besides, google either don’t like it. 🙂

It would be normal for “Nazi Germany” to be replaced by “III Reich”, usually used by authors who write about the period 1933-1945.

The Germans were (And still are, more or less) very interested in the concept of big guns on limited traverse mounts. I guess it was cheaper to take the turret of a tank, put a gun in the for hull, and call it a tank destroyer than to make a new tank altogether.

Hello! So, I was trying to find the Karl-Gerät, and I noticed that I couldn’t find anything on it…Now, whether that means it’s there and I just can’t find it, or the article just doesn’t exist, I was wondering if there’s any info on it here? If not, well…guess it’s another article to make, hey?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *