Finnish armor


Finland (1942) Assault tank – 18 built

Captured Finnish BT-7s

When the war broke out with Soviet Russia in November 1939, the Finns were severely lacking in armor and tanks. Besides antitank weapons, their only fighting vehicles were French-origin Renault FTs of WWI fame, modified and named “Koiras” and “Naaras” (machine gun and gun versions) and 26 Vickers Mark Es, of which only 12 actually got to fight.
Destroyed BT-42 Assault Gun with three colour camouflage
Knocked out BT-42 Assault Gun with three colour camouflage
However, the Finnish tactical excellence on the field allowed them to destroy or capture scores of Russian tanks. Among others, they managed to capture around 56 BT-7s in various conditions, some being abandoned in almost perfect condition, while others were repairable on a short notice.
The Finns had previously received a shipment of vintage QF 4.5 in Mk.II howitzers from the British, renamed 114 Psv.H/18 in Finnish service. Due to the inadequacy of captured tanks (which were of prewar design, lightly armed and protected), some officers expressed the idea of converting some with these spare guns, in order to have the necessary firepower to match better armored Soviet tanks.

The BT-42 conversion as an assault tank

The BT-42 (from the year of acceptance of the model) was essentially a turretless BT-7, fitted with a brand new turret housing the 114 mm (4.48 in) howitzer. The concept was influenced by the KV-2 and BT-2, BT-5 and BT-7 prewar infantry support conversions.
The turret was tall and wide, and the massive recoil mechanism was protected by an armored mantlet. The turret armor thickness was limited to just 16 mm (0.63 in) and assembled by rivets and welding. Two doors were mounted on the rear to allow easy access. Vision was possible through four vision slits, but there were no periscopes nor a commander cupola. In all, 18 vehicles were converted and pressed into service in early 1943.

The BT-42 in action

The first engagement came during the Continuation war, on the Svir River, and the BT-42s performed relatively well against enemy pillboxes. They were later confronted with Russian T-34s and scored no penetrations, even at dangerously close distances, while being destroyed in the process. After the reports, the Germans sent HEAT rounds for local production under licence, and the BT-42s were fielded with a provision of these.
They were deployed again to counter the major Soviet offensive of 1944 around Vyborg. They scored no kills, whereas eight of the nine deployed were destroyed. One of the BT-42s hit an advancing T-34 eighteen times, without stopping it. After Vyborg, the remaining BT-42s from the Finnish Detached Armour Company were disbanded, and replaced by newly-arrived German StuG IIIs.

Hello, dear reader! This article is in need of some care and attention and may contain errors or inaccuracies. If you spot anything out of place, please let us know!

Limitations in active service

The BT-42 was a quite desperate conversion, woefully adapted to the BT-7 hull. It was mediocre in every direction, and unpopular with its crews, for obvious reasons. First, the howitzer’s poor performances proved totally inadequate against fast-moving, slope-armored Soviet tanks. The tall turret was partly assembled with rivets which any non-penetrating impact could turn into deadly shrapnel.
Vision was very poor, and the rear doors (instead of armored hatches) proved as weak as if there was nothing at all to protect the crew. Most of all, the very high profile made the BT-42 an easy target, aggravated by a weight surplus (the gun itself was one ton heavier than the original intended armament), which diminished both performance and mobility in the field. Plus, since it was top-heavy and higher than wide, the BT-42 had stability issues.
The suspension and transmission were over-stressed, which proved critical for maintenance. Last but not least, the turret was cramped and the effective supply of rounds (which were old-style artillery two-pieces shells) was severely limited at best. Supply vehicles were needed in order to operate properly. In addition, there was no close-defense machine-gun.

Links on the BT-42

The BT-42 on Wikipedia
Tank Hunter BT-42
Missing Lynx kit preview

BT-42 specifications

Dimensions (L-w-H) 5.70 x 2.10 x 2.20 m
(18’8″ x 6’10” x 7’2″ ft.inches)
Total weight, battle ready 15 tons
Crew 3 (commander/gunner, driver, loader)
Propulsion Mikulin M-17T 500 hp (370 kW)
Maximum speed 53 km/h road (33 mph)
Suspension Christie type
Range 375 km (233 miles)
Armament 1 x 114 mm (4.5 in) howitzer
Armor range 6-20 mm
Turret Armor 16 mm

Finnish BT-7
A Finnish BT-7 for comparison. About 56 had been captured in good condition following the “Winter War”.
BT 42
BT-42, in green livery.
BT 42
BT-42 in the typical Finnish three-tone scheme.


BT-42 Assault Gun
BT-42 Assault Gun (Finnish Army No. Ps. 511-19) with three colour camouflage.
A Finnish BT-7 converted into a BT-42
A Finnish BT-42 converted from a captured Soviet BT-7 tank (Photo – Weronika Bialek)
Bt-42 Finnish Army tank at Parola Tank Museum
This BT-42 Assault Gun (Ps. 511-8, former R-708) took part in the battlefield trials at the River Syvari / Svir in 1943 firing at Soviet targets on the other side of the river. It is now at the Parola Tank Museum and is the only surviving example
Rear and side view of the Finnish Army BT-42 tank
Rear and side view of the Finnish Army BT-42 tank at the Parola Tank Museum.

David Lister General War Stories

By David Lister

A compilation of little known military history from the 20th century. Including tales of dashing heroes, astounding feats of valour, sheer outrageous luck and the experiences of the average soldier.

Buy this book on Amazon!

By David.B

Tank Encyclopedia's Creator, webmaster and illustrator since 2010.

3 replies on “BT-42”

Finland had even 26 vickers mark E with mark F turret. In maj 1936 Finland order 32 vickers mark E without guns. They think too have 37 mm bofors gun insted. Only one was complet with gun and a coupel of them go out to war without gun. They took lots of T 26 and prefer them more than BT 7. They took even 45 mm guns from them an put in to wickers tank and name them T 26E. You can read more in this exellent side.

Problem with the HEAT rounds designed for the BT-42 is that they did not take into account the differences in muzzle velocity, and round spin rates between guns when copying the German HEAT design. The rounds never armed themselves properly. Had the fuses been properly designed the BT-42 would have probably fared quite reasonably vs the T-34.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *