Cold War British Other Tanks

FV214 Conqueror

United Kingdom (1954)
Heavy Tank – Around 180 built total

From the “universal tank”

The postwar “Universal Tank” concept was derived from the 1944 A45 Infantry Support Tank concept, an attempt to create, right after the Centurion, a successor heavy tank to the Churchill. However both projects were fused as the FV200 universal tank series that was to have the mobility of a cruiser but the level of protection and firepower of a heavy tank as well as a versatile chassis for other purposes (ARV, SPG…). The heavy tank variant Fv201 (55 tonnes, 20-pounder gun) was chosen for development to respond to the Soviet IS-3. It was to be armed with a 120 mm, however the delay to create such massive gun and the turret led to the transitional F221 Caernarvon, fitted with the Centurion Mk.2 turret. Eventually, the definitive FV214 was built in 1955 in two series; and deliveries lasted until 1959.



The Conqueror was the last British Heavy Tank in service. It was largely a product of ww2 thinking about tanks, and unlike first generation MBTs, put the typical emphasis on firepower and protection over mobility. They were tailored to defeat the Soviet IS-3 when the cold war was at its hottest and would have been surely up to the job (see later). The hull made of RHA was all-welded and relatively low, with a well-sloped glacis nose and cast turret design. The armor level was particularly high, with 178 mm nominal thickness front plates (7 inches), but equivalent to 250 mm (10 inches) LOS (line of sight). The lower beak was 78 mm at 60°, the rear part of the front glacis, connected to the turret ring, 21 mm at 83°, and rear engine deck 17 mm, the rear plate 51 mm (flat), the rear lower plate 31 mm at 70° and the bottom, 13 mm. The upper and lower side walls were 51 mm thick, flat, and the protective side skirts 6 mm.
Armour Scheme
Conqueror Armour scheme
The cast armor turret had a similar front thickness and even superior on the mantlet (200 mm). The front was 150-170 mm thick, the front slope was 44 mm at 78°, the roof 31 mm, the rear 31 mm, and the rounded sides walls 89 mm. The general profile of the tank stayed relatively low, slightly higher than the IS-3.


The hull and chassis of the FV 200 series were designed for a wide variety of duties, and sturdy enough for the heaviest loads. It was composed of a typical “heavy tank” drivetrain, in two 8×2 roadwheels groups per side, for 64 roadwheels in total, resting on double pin, large track links to reduce ground pressure. Reinforced and sturdy Horstmann units instead of torsion bars assumed the suspension. The paradox was only light tanks and the heaviest in service in the UK were given these, like, until the Chieftain in the 1960s. By the 1980s, the Challenger adopted hydropneumatic units. Based on coil springs bogies, they had a relatively long course, were 100% external and easy to replace and maintain, while the torsion bars were partly internal.
At Bovington
Conqueror mk.I at Bovington
All this armor made it for an exceptionally heavy tank, at 64 tons compared to the Centurion’s 51. The only source of power available was the proven Rolls Royce Meteor, in a souped-up version of the ww2 Cromwell and Centurion 650 hp, coupled with a 5-speed Merrit-Brown Z51R Mk. F gearbox. Its top speed and range were consequently severely limited, and the stress both on the engine, transmission (only 800 hp), and suspensions took its toll, making it mechanically unreliable. Tactical mobility in addition was limited by the few bridges capable to handle it weight. However the small roadwheels resting on many bogies and wide tracks had the effect of giving similar traction and mobility performances as the Churchill, if not better. It could climb and go in some places the centurion couldn’t, despite the latter was 13 tons lighter.


The IS-3 main gun indeed was ill-designed for accurate long-range fire, fast rate of fire or was limited in its ammunition capacity due to old-fashioned two-stage rounds. On the contrary, the British Royal Ordnance L1 120 mm rifled gun was tailor-made and much more capable gun than the IS-3 at long range. In fact, all studies shown that it was capable to out-range the IS-3 by a generous margin. That, in theory, would have rendered heavy armor unnecessary, but experience showed that engagements rarely occurred in optimal distances and terrains. The secondary armament comprised two cal.30 Browning machine guns, one coaxial and the second placed on the roof, manned by the tank commander.
At Bovington
Conqueror Mk.I rotatable Tank Commander Cupola at Bovington
It should be noticed that the commander had an advanced rotating cupola, providing an equally advanced fire control system as he could align it on a target independently of the turret, to measure the range with a coincidence rangefinder. He could then direct the gunner on the laying and azimuth parameters which were mechanically indicated in the cupola. This was a very early “hunter-killer” mode allowing to rapidly engage several targets. At the same time, the Soviet TPKU-2 and TKN-3 did not use a rangefinder.
Conqueror mark 1
Conqueror Mk.I on trials in 1956


FV214 Conqueror Mk I This first version (20 built) had three periscopes for the driver.
FV214 Conqueror Mk II This second, more produced version (160) had redesigned frontal armour plates joins but a single rotatable periscope for the driver, and a modified, improved exhaust system.
FV215: A semi-SPG design with a FV200 chassis mounting a limited traverse turret armed with a 183 mm gun. Only a wooden mockup was produced. More information can be found HERE.
Caernarvon mark II
Caernarvon mark II

The FV221 Caernarvon

Considered as a stopgap tank before the heavy turret was ready, it was nonetheless part of the FV 200 lineage. At the end, the Centurion was found better. Only the Caernarvon mobility was judged satisfactory, as its turret was far lighter and its engine at least on paper (800 hp vs 650 hp) much more capable. But in terms of speed and range, it lagged behind. They were given the Mk III 20 pounder turret of the Centurion mark II but never really hit their mark as main battle tank and after a single prototype Mark I, only a short experimental serie (21) Mark II was released.

FV219 & FV222 Conqueror ARV

This was the heavy Armoured Recovery Vehicle (ARV), still used years after the retirement of the main type. The FV219 Mk.I (8 produced) was succeeded by the Mk.II, with 20 produced.

In action

All the 180 Conqueror ever built were stationed in Germany, in the northern British sector, facing the possible Soviet onslaught. Their rôle was also to provide a long-range cover for the early, 20-pdr armed Centurions. They would have been also directed against Soviet heavy tanks units, on par with the American M103s. They stayed in service in Germany only seven years, nine given to each tank regiment, and usually grouped in three tank troops. They Participated in rare exercises (due to their poor tactical mobility). In the early 1960s, the arrival of the Centurion armed with ROF’s L7 gun made the last British heavy tank obsolete and they were retired.
Surviving vehicles could be found at the Bovington Tank Museum, and the Land Warfare Hall of the Imperial War Museum Duxford. Another is on display in France, at the Musée des Blindés, Belgium at the Royal Museum of the Army (Brussels) and Kubinka in Russia. The American Littlefield Collection also counts one. In Germany, several training target hulks could be seen at the Haltern Training area. ARVs also survived, two at the Military History Museum on the Isle of Wight, and the REME Museum of Technology.

Sources/Links about the Chieftain

The Conqueror on Wikipedia
Conqueror and various concepts on Henk of Holland

Video: Duxford Tankfest 17/06/2012


Mark I BovingtonScammell transport ARV2

Conqueror specifications

Dimensions 38oa/25.4 x 13.1 x 10.5 ft (12 x 3.99 x 3.19 m)
Total weight, battle ready 64 tons short (128,000 lbs)
Crew 4 (Driver, commander, gunner, loader)
Propulsion Rolls-Royce Meteor M120 810 hp (604 kW) – pwr 12 hp/t
Suspension Hortsmann suspensions
Speed (road) 22 mph (35 kph)
Range 100 mi (164 km)
Armament Main : ROF L1 4.7 in (120 mm)
Sec. coaxial + roof Browning 0.3 in (7.62 mm)
Armor 7 in (180 mm) front glacis+turret (250 mm LOS)
Total production 185 in 1959.
FV 221 Caernarvon
FV 221 Caernarvon. It has to be the main battle tank of the ubiquitous FV 200 serie, but the success of the A45 Centurion made it obsolete. Only 21 were built.
FV 214 Conqueror Mark I based in West Germany in the early 1960s.
FV 214 Mark II based in West Germany.

By David.B

Tank Encyclopedia's Creator, webmaster and illustrator since 2010.

16 replies on “FV214 Conqueror”

Just a little thing to point out, the IS-3’s gun (D-25T) wasn’t developed from a naval gun, it was derived from the A-19 which was an Army artillery piece. And separate charges were also used for the M103’s (thus Conqueror’s) 120mm gun. The reason behind the separate charges (at least in the soviet 122mm) was to ease the process of loading, since a full shell with propellant would weight around 40 kg.

The MK 1 Conquerer did not have seperate charges for the 120mm gun, it had a complete shell and charge all in one , Hesh, A/P , Smoke and Sabot . The shells were stacked around the turret, the loader if he was competent could get three rounds of gunfire in the air at a long range target, and a competent gunner would adjust the ranges between each round as it was loaded. the shells weighed approx 45lb each . I was the gunnery instructor for the 4th/7th Royal Dragoon Guards at Fallingbostel Germany in 1955/6/7.

we in the 14/20 kings hussars tested the hull { i.e the caernarvan} in sabratha libya then when we came home to
piddlinton dorset i was sent to bovington trials hanger to put the conquerer {with two crews } through its shake down
trials we drove it day and night are there any other lads out there who remember bovington

Hello, maybe you could help me?
Im searching for reference pictures of the decals of these two tanks:
On this first picture we can see the desert rats logo on the left side, registration plate in the middle and anonther insignia on the right which is barely visible (Thats the one im searching for)
On this second picture we have the weight ID on the left, a decal which i dont know showing a 2 (colors?/Unit?) and another insignia on the left showing something crossed (Swords/Bones/Keys?)
It would be awesome if you could help me identify those.

As far as I can figure out (I’m not expert in unit symbols), the first picture shows the 4th/7th Royal Dragoon Guards in Germany.
No idea for the second.

I joined the 14/20 KH in Piddlehinton. I heard that the trials fell behind schedule so to complete the required mileage it was run non stop for 2 days and nights. It wore out many crews – that was the story I was told, grown in the telling probably. According to “Soldier” we should have been equipped with it but its arrival was never even rumoured in 1956/57. It was just too heavy and bulky. Stories that the gun control was too complicated, that the radios did not work, and there was only one type of shell available , are surely just malicious gossip.

The MK1 Conqueror Tank was based in West Germany in the early 1950s not the 1960s as stated ex 4th/7th sig/gunner.

I was was a REME ECE in Falingbostel attached to the 8th tanks and later the 5th after amalgamation then on loan to the 4/7th Dragoon Guards (that was an eye opener afer being with the Tankies) Both regiments had the Conquerors I think they were later models. I was there late ’59 early ’60’s. Needless to say none of them strayed very far from their hangers though did get onto the firing range once. Sorry no photos no fancy phoned in those days.

i really wonder how the 120 mm L11 would have been so much better than the 122 mm tank gun however, look just to the HEAT ammo.
About the Conqueror, it’s really impressive how this beast handled: being the same weight of the K.Tiger, it’s equally a very slow, slow tank, the YT film state it cleary, they were even worried to pass throught a simple mud/water pool. While the rear T-55 ran like a deer in the same event.
I am also a bit skeptical about the better agility on terrain compared vs the Centurion, for the same reasons.

There was nothing wrong with the conqueror across country it was a better ride than the centurion because the conqueror didn’t have shockers on, it would just like roll along, I drove one for two years, and if it was used on exercises properly ie support tank instead of a battle tank like the centurion it would keep going.

My Dad, Brendan Delaney, was a tankie in the 4/7th RDG (after a spell in the Green Jackets). He went on to para jump with the Malkara scout car, and was in Aden, with the shrapnel scars as a souvenir. I have a photo I’ll upload (only one I have of him in uniform) of him on his 21st birthday, in a forest on the East German border on 6th September 1965. I’ll get off my Ma as it’s location is written on the back. He said as well as crosstraining to perform any function, the Conqueror was a right bugger, re reliability, and they spent most of their time fixing breakdowns, but also said the Gun was impressive.
I didn’t know what he meant when he talked of sabot, hesh and ap rounds, but read up on it afterwards. He said he once used a gun charge, on a German farmers land, buried it, chucked some bread around, and used the batteries for the radio to run a cable, to make a Chicken IED! They skinned the chickens, and made a huge soup that supplemented their meagre rounds. I hope someone here knows him.
He also said, that when working, they could tackle cross country material better than the Yanks, who had auto gearboxes. Downside, was they lost a crew, after crossing a bridge before a steep uphill climb. Last tank’s driver, missed a gear, and it rolled backwards into the river. Night time, turret closed, so lost some of his mates. The old man, was convinced driver was exhausted, as they’d pulled a lot of hours without a break.

Sorry, Humber with Malkara missile. In 66 they were sent to Northern Ireland, in Tyrone (can’t remember barracks, but had scout cars they took out now and again). Before the troubles, I hasten to add. And met my mother…he left the 4/7th, in, I think 1968/9.

I found this web on Conquer tanks and found it very interesting . I was in the R,E,M,E. in between 1953 to 1955
at Vitten-Annen Germany in the recovery section and in 1954 or early 1955 I transported one of the first batch of
Conquer tanks from the docks in Hamburg to the Hussars Regiment in Iserlohn with our Mighty Antar wagon it
us 3 days to do 300 miles. It must have been one of the mark ones I think !.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *